Acting Palls on Leslie (1936)
Acting Palls on Leslie–Oh, Definitely!
By Paul Harrison
Hollywood — Leslie Howard is tired of acting. Oh, fearfully!
Being tired of acting is one thing, and being bored with acting is another. Oh, quite! Mr. Howard is both.
Just now he is mostly tired. Playing Romeo is a task. Oh, definitely! It presents too many problems to be in the least boring. The problems are mostly those of trying to sound natural while reciting poetry, and of trying not to sound rethorical in spots where the situations call for plain speaking.
Mr. Howard is not too fond of the role of Romeo. He’s grateful for several deletions which spare Romeo a lot of tiresome speeches. And he does wish they’d hurry with the picture so he can get on with his personal plans.
These plans include, first of all, a Broadway production of Hamlet. and then a picture in England, and a play or two, and finally a divorce from grease paint. He wants to be a producer, a director, and possibly a writer–although his experiences as a writer haven’t been terribly encouraging up to now.
The reason Mr. Howard is going to do Hamlet is because he has reached a point in his acting career–he calls it “an hiatus in my acting career”–“Where I need to finish off with something tip-top.”
He believes that Hamlet is the hardest thing an actor can do, and he has worked for months on plans for the production. It will be only a limited engagement, and he hopes it can take place this spring. The way things are going with Romeo and Juliet, though, it may be posponed until autumn.
Wants to Borrow Self
The picture in England will be about “Bonnie Prince Charlie.” Mr. Howard’s screen services happen to be tied up by a contract to Warner Brothers, and it may be that Mr. Howard will not be able to borrow himself to act in his own production. If he had to hire some other actor, it would be embarrassing. Oh, very!
As soon as he decently can get around to it, Mr. Howard wants to quit acting. He’s sure a good many other seasoned performers feel the same way in the matter, though most of them haven’t got around to admitting it.
“Stage acting is exciting at first,” he said. “Very! But there is no mental activity in doing the same things over and over again. Screen acting isn’t quite satisfying, either. I really like to work. I detest the intervals of idleness that actors call ‘resting.’
“Picture directing–that’s what I most want to do. Oh, tremendously! Of course I have some ideas about it. Principally, I want to try to use the screen to better advantage as an individual medium. since talkies came in they have been tied too closely to the stage. Everyone seems to consider that the big job is writing dialog, but I believe the action should be just as great a literary task.”
Mr. Howard hopes that pictures–some pictures, anyway–will be made with a bit more intellectual appeal, and so labeled. This is less a reflection on the standard of movie fan taste than it is a tribute, because he believes the great majority of fans would prefer more artistic productions.
What he deplores is the willingness of some of the studios to allow a small, lowbrow minority to influence their policies. Commercialism rears its ugly head.
In that respect, though, he finds high taxes a very encouraging cultural agent. “It’s getting to the point,” he observed, “where money is no longer much of an incentive, since taxes become almost confiscatory in the high brackets. (Writer’s note: Mr. Howard used to work in a bank). So the main incentive now is to do something better than the next man. That’s rather healthy, really. Artistically, I mean.”
(The Meriden Daily Journal, February 5. 1936)